The Lagos State Command of Man O’ War Nigeria is facing one of the most significant internal crises in its recent history following serious allegations levelled against its State Commander, Lucky Onimowo.
The development has sparked concern among officers, stakeholders, and members of the public, with mounting calls for transparency and institutional reform within the command.
At the heart of the controversy are claims bordering on financial mismanagement, lack of accountability, and alleged misuse of operational assets.
Multiple reports from within the Lagos Command allege that funds earmarked for training, operations, and community engagement were not properly accounted for.
Officers and stakeholders are said to have raised concerns over limited financial disclosure and what they describe as inadequate transparency in the management of resources.
The allegations have intensified demands for an immediate public financial disclosure and an independent audit to clarify the state of the command’s finances.
Observers note that for an organization founded on discipline and structured hierarchy, accountability remains a non-negotiable principle.
Equally troubling are accusations that vehicles and properties assigned for official Man O’ War duties were allegedly diverted for personal and family use. Operational assets, stakeholders argue, are entrusted to leadership strictly for institutional service and community operations.
If substantiated, such actions could raise questions about adherence to internal regulations and the ethical standards expected of officers within the paramilitary body.
Sources within the command also point to rising dissatisfaction among officers. Reports suggest concerns over welfare neglect, limited access to training and promotion opportunities, and an apparent breakdown in communication between leadership and rank-and-file members.
Analysts warn that declining morale within a structured organization such as Man O’ War could undermine operational effectiveness and weaken public confidence.
Among the most serious claims are assertions that resources intended for organizational development may have been redirected toward personal or family-related projects. Should these allegations be proven, they would constitute a breach of fiduciary responsibility and institutional ethics.
The organization, known for promoting patriotism, character development, and community service, now faces what many describe as a defining moment.
In response to the unfolding situation, concerned stakeholders are calling for:
•An immediate independent investigation into the allegations
•A comprehensive financial audit covering all donations and expenditures
•A forensic review of asset management practices
•The temporary stepping aside of the State Commander to allow for an impartial inquiry
•Public release of investigative findings to restore confidence
